Dimitar Kuzmanov vs Nerman Fatic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 21 Jul at 05:35 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
D. Kuzmanov vs N. Fatic

BUL
4
Win
Played
4
Win

BIH
4
Win
Played
4
Win
Head-to-head: Kuzmanov 4 - 4 Fatic
They have played 18 sets in total, with Dimitar Kuzmanov winning 10 and Nerman Fatic winning 8. The last match between Nerman Fatic and Dimitar Kuzmanov was at the Zug Challenger, 21-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 5-7 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kuzmanov | 4 |
| Fatic | 4 |
Last 8 H2H Matches:
(R1) Zug Challenger(07-21-25)
(R1) Zadar Challenger(03-18-24)
(Rubber 1) Davis Cup, Group I, PO, BUL-BIH 1-3(02-03-24)
D. Kuzmanov vs N. Fatic H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $89,730 | Career Prize Money | $73,995 |
| 62.64% (560-334) | Career Total W/L | 58.49% (403-286) |
| 3 | Clay | 3 |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor | 1 |
| 23 | Titles | 12 |
| 4 | Total H2H Matches | 4 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-1) |
D. Kuzmanov vs N. Fatic Match Preview:
- In recent months, Kuzmanov has demonstrated a slight edge in second serve performance, winning 47.09% of points compared to Fatic's 42.3%. Will this translate into a match advantage?
- Both players show almost identical stats in return games, with Fatic marginally advancing in first serve returns (29.48%) compared to Kuzmanov (28.69%).
- Kuzmanov is stronger under pressure, saving 58.53% of breakpoints, compared to Fatic's 51.66%. Could this be a pivotal factor in a tight match?
- Overall, in the last year, Fatic has a higher match win rate of 72.13% compared to Kuzmanov's 60%, indicating a potential dominance overall.
- Surface preference could play a role; Kuzmanov thrives on hard courts with a 71% win rate, while Fatic excels on clay with a 61% win rate.
- Both players have performed similarly in Challengers/ITF events > $10K, with Kuzmanov slightly ahead with a 61.02% win rate (compared to Fatic's 59.38%).
- Their head-to-head record is closely contested, but Kuzmanov leads with 4 wins to Fatic's 3, having also won their latest encounter.
- Though Kuzmanov leads in head-to-head tiebreaks, Fatic has an upper hand in set-deciders, winning more often in crucial moments. How might this influence the match's outcome?
- Fatic has faced slightly lower-ranked opponents, which could complicate his adaptation to Kuzmanov, who has competed against higher caliber players.
- Deciding set performance favors Fatic significantly, with an 82% win rate in deciders over the last year, compared to Kuzmanov's 40%.
- Both players show similar breakpoint conversion stats, with Kuzmanov slightly ahead at 36.97% compared to Fatic's 36.49%.
Editorial Prediction (July 21, 2025, UTC):
With both players exhibiting strengths and weaknesses, this upcoming match promises to be closely contested. Fatic has displayed greater success in matches over the last year, coupled with a strong performance in deciding sets.
Kuzmanov's recent win over Fatic and his better handling of breakpoints could give him an edge, especially on surfaces other than clay. His slight advantage in second serve stats might also work in his favor during crucial moments.
Ultimately, the match may come down to small margins in pressure situations. Despite Fatic's advantage in deciding sets, Kuzmanov's consistent performance against higher-ranked opponents and his favorable recent head-to-head record suggest he may narrowly emerge victorious in this matchup.
Based on the analysis of the current statistics and trends, Dimitar Kuzmanov is most likely to win this upcoming tennis match.
Dimitar Kuzmanov vs Nerman Fatic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
D. Kuzmanov vs N. Fatic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4 | H2H Matches Won | 4 |
| 10 | Sets Won | 8 |
| 89 | Games Won | 74 |
| 11 | Aces (Total) | 17 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 17 |
| 1:27:22 | Average Match Time | 1:27:22 |
| 69% (295/430) | 1st Serve % | 68% (316/462) |
| 65% (192/295) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (186/316) |
| 53% (71/135) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (68/146) |
| 41% (26/64) | Break Pts Won % | 55% (18/33) |
| 45% (208/462) | Return Points Win % | 39% (167/430) |
| 50% (4/8) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (4/8) |
| 0% (0/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 67% (4/6) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 33% (2/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 33% (2/6) |
Recent Performance Stats
D. Kuzmanov Recent Matches Played
N. Fatic Recent Matches Played

D. Kuzmanov vs N. Fatic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.64% (560/334) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.49% (403/286) |
| 61.47% (1257/788) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.51% (888/656) |
| 55.50% (10397/8335) | Games Win/Loss | 53.04% (7574/6706) |
| 70.72% (227/94) | Hard Win/Loss | 51.19% (43/41) |
| 61.16% (307/195) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.00% (341/218) |
| 36.36% (24/42) | Indoor Hard W/L | 43.18% (19/25) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 1437 | Aces Total | 1568 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1472 | Total Double Faults | 1510 |
| 1:14:34 | Average Match Time | 1:19:52 |
| 529.71 | Average Opponent Rank | 509.43 |
| 66% (28696/43466) | 1st Serve % | 66% (23679/35628) |
| 67% (19094/28696) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (15504/23679) |
| 52% (7701/14770) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (5733/11949) |
| 45% (2204/4885) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1961/4201) |
| 43% (18305/43040) | Return Points Win % | 43% (15552/35990) |
| 36.84% (7/12) | Slam W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 61.54% (16/10) | Cups W/L | 40.00% (4/6) |
| 39.29% (11/17) | Main Tour W/L | 25.00% (3/9) |
| 55.35% (207/167) | Challenger W/L | 52.91% (118/105) |
| 71.36% (319/128) | Futures W/L | 63.24% (277/161) |
| 63% (547/866) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (394/661) |
| 50% (7/14) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 49% (102/210) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (79/156) |
| 48% (121/252) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (102/188) |
| 85% (583/498) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (393/347) |
| 14% (583/83) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (393/42) |
| 21% (311/64) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (296/57) |